
According to the Los Angeles Times, the charges were tossed out last year by U.S. District Judge S. James Otero, who ruled that the conduct described by prosecutors in their indictment did not violate the federal law under which O'Donnell was charged. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals panel disagreed in June. As a result of the ruling, the charges were reinstated and the case was ordered back to Otero's court.
When the federal appeals court reinstated the charges, Birotte's office claimed to be "very pleased" with the ruling.
How "pleased" should Americans be that an Obama-appointed prosecutor is supporting the Rove Racket's purely political prosecution of O'Donnell?
To support the notion that O'Donnell was being singled out by the Rove Republicans, his lawyers presented prosecutors with 21 illegal campaign contribution cases they said were handled administratively by the Federal Elections Commission, even though most involved larger amounts of money and more egregious conduct than what was alleged in O'Donnell's case, according to the Los Angeles Times.
Without a doubt, Birotte should receive another black-eye and his ego fed to the political shredder.
No comments:
Post a Comment
You are welcome to comment. The usual rules of professional blogging conduct apply. We reserve the right to edit slanderous comments or vulgarities. Any form of slurs based on religion, race, ethnicity, or sexual orientation will not be posted or tolerated.